McCain Continues to Lie About Obama’s Pakistan Policy

Senator McCain has consistently mistated Senator Obama’s policy on Pakistan.  Obama has repeatedly stated that Al Qaida is the target, and if Pakistan can’t or won’t pursue Bin Laden or Al Qaida, then the United States must.

That’s it.

John “Bomb-Bomb-Bomb, Bomb-Bomb-Iran” McCain keeps saying Barack wants to invade Pakistan.

Horribly off base, John.

Barack Obama can see gray.  Barack Obama is demonstrating a clear ability to under the complexity of many issues.  McCain barely comprehends his own sound bites.

Mike Kean, a friend of mine writing from the University of Illinois, pointed this out as well, “Obama simply answered the question about going into Pakistan by saying that if the Pakistani government was incapable of fighting Al Qaeda, he would support sending troops across the border to fight them. Then, McCain spent his entire response going on and on about Teddy Roosevelt saying that he needs to talk softly and carry a big stick and claiming that Obama was saying he would invade Pakistan. That’s not at all what Obama was saying. Then Obama had a rebuttal, repeating what he already said, and McCain came back and said the same thing again, blatantly misrepresenting what Obama. I dont know what’s worse: whether McCain thinks that the American people wouldn’t notice, or that most Americans probably didn’t notice what McCain was doing.

“All around this campaign has been frustrating as hell throughout the whole damn thing.”

Amen.

Tell the Media to Call Sarah Palin a LIAR

From our friends, the Democrats:

Democrats.com, the Aggressive Progressives - 500,000 strong and growing! email the democrats

Tell The Media to Call Sarah Palin a Serial Liar

email the democrats It is now thoroughly documented that Sarah Palin supported the $398 million “Bridge to Nowhere” when she ran for Governor in 2006, even though Congress cancelled the earmark in 2005.

She only opposed it in September 2007 after her final efforts to get $329 million more from Congress failed. Yet she kept the partial funding from Congress!

So when Palin repeatedly says “I told Congress, ‘Thanks, but no thanks’ on that bridge to nowhere,” she is repeatedly lying.

It is long past time for reporters to call Sarah Palin exactly what she is – a serial liar.

Sign our petition to the Media:

http://www.democrats.com

Why Obama Must Win

From Andrew Sullivan:

This decision is not worthy of a great power. Whatever skills Palin may turn out to have, however fabulous a person she may turn out to be, even if she becomes the Eva Peron of Christianism, McCain had no idea when he picked her.

He winged this. That’s the critical, unavoidable, devastating point.

John McCain has demonstrated with this insane decision that he is unfit to be president of the United States. This was an act of near-criminal negligence. If he can behave this recklessly and impulsively with this decision, the idea of allowing him to become president of the United States is only a smidgen less terrifying than thinking of Palin in that position.

Whatever few doubts I may once have still had about this election, they are resolved now.

Obama has to win. The alternative is unthinkable.

John McCain is actually suggesting that Palin is qualified to be President of the United States because Alaska is near Russia.

Yes, I called it.  But never in a million years did I think the Republicans would try to sell that malarkey.  Republicans don’t think too highly of Americans if they think the majority will fall for that noise.

Any way you look at it, it’s gotta be Obama.

Unemployment Up by 6.1%

This says it all:

Joblessness grew by an additional 84,000 in August 2008, bumping the national unemployment rate up to 6.1 percent. This is the highest level in five years and the eighth straight month of job losses. The economy has lost more than 600,000 over that time period.

Hardest hit were manufacturing jobs and the construction industry, fueled by the housing crisis and more movement of manufacturing jobs out of the country. Economists have tied the movement of jobs offshore to the free trade policies advocated by John McCain and George W. Bush as well as to Republican Party tax policies that encourage the creation of jobs in other countries.

Manufacturing has been hit by job losses for the past 26 straight months, totaling more than three quarters of a million lost.

So why is John McCain running on the policies of George W. Bush?

Sarah Palin Lied About Selling Jet on eBay

Sarah Palin lied

So it turns out Sarah Palin told a lie when she reminded America that one of her best qualifications to serve in high office was putting a jet for sale on eBay. “I came to office promising major ethics reform to end the culture of self-dealing, and today that ethics reform is the law. While I was at it, I got rid of a few things in the Governor’s Office that I didn’t believe our citizens should have to pay for. That luxury jet was over the top. I put it on eBay,” she said.

Turns out eBay was really a bad move on Palin’s part — poor judgment. Yes, she put the plane on eBay, but she did not sell it on eBay, and she did not sell it for a profit, as she and John McCain claimed.

I know — she never actually said she sold the plane on eBay.  She did, however, infer it.  And we were supposed to be happy being duped.

From the Anchorage Daily News:

The state has tried selling its unwanted jet online four times and failed. So last week, the Palin administration signed a contract with an Anchorage aircraft broker who thinks he can succeed where eBay couldn’t The eBay thing didn’t work out very well, said Dan Spencer, director of administrative services for the Department of Public Safety. He’s the person charged with trying to get rid of the infamous Westwind II.

The administration made a deal last week with Turbo North Aviation, promising the broker a 1.49 percent cut of the selling price.

The New York Times tells the story of the sale:

It grounded one governor and did not exactly fly off the shelf on eBay, but the jet that came to symbolize the troubles of the former Alaska governor Frank H. Murkowski has landed with a new owner.

A businessman from Valdez, Alaska, Larry Reynolds, paid $2.1 million this week for the state-owned Westwind II jet that Mr. Murkowski’s successor, Gov. Sarah S. Palin, promised to purge from the state inventory when she ran against Mr. Murkowski last fall in the Republican primary.

Mr. Murkowski’s office tried to obtain money from the Homeland Security Department to buy the jet, saying it would help “defend, deter or defeat opposition forces.” He was denied. Later, in 2005, against the wishes of the Legislature, Mr. Murkowski used state money to buy it for $2.7 million.

So the state of Alaska bought the jet for $2.7 million and sold it for $2.1 million.  That’s well over a half-a-million dollar loss.

I learned this by doing a few quick searches on Google.  This isn’t exactly national security information.

Did the McCain campaign vet Palin at all? Did they even go online to see if perhaps she was telling the truth?

One final note: several times this week we heard from the McCain campaign and from John McCain himself that one of Sarah Palin’s qualifications for the vice presidency is the fact that Alaska is right next to Russia.  Maybe that’s supposed to be national-security-knowledge-by-osmosis — I don’t know.

If Alaska is so critical to our national security, isn’t it strange that Homeland Security would deny the governor a jet to help patrol the nation’s borders?

ABC Newsbrief: Barack Obama Had Two Fathers

There are some very good reasons I don’t watch ABC News any more.  This one is just too funny, and gives me more reason to stay away.

Terry Moran on Nightline:

“To Barack Obama, the son of a black man from Kenya, and a white man from Kansas. Now, no matter what your politics, that is a moment for the history books.”

One for the history books indeed.

What I Missed in John McCain’s Speech

I listened to John McCain’s acceptance speech tonight.  I was incredibly moved by his story.  We heard his personal several times tonight.

Right now I’m listening to commentators on MSNBC saying John McCain confessed George W. Bush’s sins.  They’re falling all over themselves in awe that McCain dared to denounce Bush.

But did he really?

Here’s what I missed in McCain’s grand “confessions”:

If John McCain rejects the sins of the Bush Administration and wants to make amends with the American people, then why did he vote with George W. Bush over 90% of the time?  Is McCain a recent convert to some truth?  Was he knocked off his horse this week?

Why did McCain ride the Bush gravy train to personal wealth for almost eight years while the rest of us fell so far behind?

Why, John?  Why?

Republican Congressman Calls Obama ‘Uppity’

Georgia Republican Rep. Lynn Westmoreland used the term “uppity” to describe Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama Thursday.

While discussing Sarah Palin’s speech with reporters outside the House chamber, Westmorland was asked to compare Palin with Michelle Obama.

That’s when he let loose with the racially-charged epithet.

From USA Today:

“Honestly, I’ve never paid that much attention to Michelle Obama,” Westmoreland said. “Just what little I’ve seen of her and Senator [Barack] Obama, is that they’re a member of an elitist class…that thinks that they’re uppity.”

The 58-year-old, Atlanta-born congressman declined to elaborate further, though he did repeat one part of his comment when asked to clarify.

“Uppity, you said?” he was asked.

“Yeah, uppity,” Westmoreland replied.

Westmorland is white.

Later, Westmorland’s press secretary Brian Robinson tried to clarify, insisting that the congressman was trying to say Barack is “elite.”  Westmoreland apparently instructed his staff to check the dictionary to be sure he properly understood the meaning of the word.

Vanessa Beasley, who teaches political rhetoric at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, said “uppity” is a word that hits the ear of African-Americans in a negative way — evoking images of the pre-civil rights era, when powerful whites sometimes punished blacks who spoke up for themselves.

“It has very clear roots in the history of slavery in the South,” Beasley said. “The term ‘uppity’ has such a specific, contextual historic meaning. It is more evocative of a particular moment in history and particular set of fears that exist today within certain parts of the electorate.

“The racial politics that it reanimates are very worrisome.”

I would bet a bale of cotton the congressman from Georgia knew exactly what he was saying.

Welcome to the Republican Party, 2008.  Amazingly, it’s a lot like the Republican Party of 1958.